Author Archives: Jesse

Broadweave Buys Out Veracity, Customers From Other Providers

By | | , ,
50 Comments

Broadweave announced today that they plan to go one step further than buying out the customer lists and acquire Veracity as well. Veracity has over 10,000 clients but only a handful are on UTOPIA or iProvo. Most of Veracity's customer base is in T-1 lines or DSL services as well as business voice communications. This means that Broadweave plans to grow overnight from 1100 to over 20,000 subscribers. I seriously doubt they can handle all of that growth.

It's worth noting that Nuvont, which is still a provider on UTOPIA, buys all of its services from Veracity. XMission also has a deal to buy VoIP services from Veracity. It will be interesting to see if Broadweave will remain on UTOPIA and continue these contracts for services or pull an AT&T on us.

See more from the Daily Herald. 

Evaluating the iProvo Asset Purchase Agreement

By | | ,
3 Comments

I took the time to sit down with a copy of the proposed purchased agreement with Broadweave (warning, PDF) and found a number of glaring holes and deficiencies in this arragement.

  • Broadweave Networks of Provo LLC is listed as the purchaser, yet no such corporation currently exists with the State of Utah. The purchase agreement is for a non-existent entity, therefore that more-or-less voids it right off the bat. (See 1st paragraph)
  • Provo is offering a 2-year warranty on the fiber. That's right: Provo foots the bill for fiber repairs for the first two years! (See 3(y)(ii) and nearby definitions)
  • Since Broadweave Networks of Provo LLC doesn't exist and has no valid business license, it's not a valid Purchaser per this agreement. (See 4(a))
  • Anyone with access to the Utah Courts' Xchange system want to make sure that it's true that there's no pending litigation against Broadweave? I've heard several rumors that residents in Traverse Ridge have had to go months or even years without primary phone line service from Broadweave and that several lawsuits have been threatened. (See 4(d))
  • I suppose that the lack of corporate existence for Broadweave Networks of Provo LLC could be construed as a misrepresentation. (See 4(f))
  • Provo is asking that Broadweave make a "good faith effort" to preserve existing services. Which, really, is broad enough to allow Broadweave to do whatever it likes. (See 5(g))
  • Provo's non-voting member on the board can be kicked out of meetings if they determine that there's "highly proprietary" information being discussed. Any bets that this will happen often? (See 5(c)… the second one since someone can't use ordered lists in Word properly)
  • If Broadweave sells the network just before going under, the city would lose control of the network and there would be nearly nothing left to pay remaining balances if Broadweave takes the money and runs. (See 5(d), again, the second one)
  • Broadweave will be bound to continue building the network to new developments, though the agreement uses a vauge "commercially reasonable time" phrasing that could easily let Broadweave off the hook. (See 5(q))
  • I noticed that nothing in Section 5 gives Provo the right to keep any upgrades or other improvements done to the network in the case of a default. If they replace the existing equipment with new equipment, then auction it off in bankruptcy proceedings, Provo could be left with a crippled network.
  • Now waitaminute… Broadweave gets to do its due diligence against Provo but nothing affords the city the same right. (See 6(u))
  • Broadweave is claiming that its Provo operation's address is the same as the Provo NOC. Kind of cheeky considering the company doesn't even exist, eh? (See 9(b))

My takeaway from this is that Provo hasn't covered all of its bases at all, creating a lease agreement that's very much in favor of the purchaser. Any lawyer-like people care to take a crack at it?

Broadweave Lacks Proper Business Licenses, Corporation Filings

By | | ,
15 Comments

You'd like to think that a company planning to buy city assets would have all of their paperwork ducks in a row. Seems that Broadweave, however, has neglected to file a substantial amount of paperwork required to legally do business. South Jordan, the location of the company's headquarters, has no listings for Broadweave. Draper has never heard of them before. The woman I spoke to with Washington City said they've been trying to get them to get a valid business license for a long time and will probably refer them to enforcement soon. Lehi hasn't gotten back to me yet on their license status in that city, but given the 0 for 3 record in other cities where they do business, I don't have my hopes up that they filed anything there either.

And what of Provo? Broadweave has also failed to obtain a business license from the city of Provo. They also have not registered Broadweave of Provo, LLC with the state of Utah, the business entity that was supposed to be buying the network. How can the city sign a deal with a business entity that doesn't even exist? It's not like Broadweave doesn't know how to do it; they have registrations for subsidiaries in St. George, Hurricane, Washington, Herriman and "Rosecrest".

I'm also trying to find out if Broadweave is telling the truth about how long they have been an established business. They did not register their current domain, broadweave.com, until June of 2003 though their website indicates that this company has been around since 1999. Seems odd for a tech company to go 4 years without snapping up the domain that bears their trademark, isn't it? Pending some feedback from the Utah Department of Commerce, we'll know for sure. I'm betting the company wasn't filed until 2003 making their claim of getting their first contract in 1999 patently false.

UPDATE: Lehi just confirmed that they don't have a business license in their city either. Surprise, surprise.

Broadweave CEO Steve Christensen Got Exclusive Contract in Traverse Mountain From His Father

By | | , ,
Leave a comment

This kind of news is almost too good to report. After being tipped off by an anonymous source, I did a bit of digging as to who owns Traverse Mountain. Turns out that it's a Mr. Stephen Christensen, an uncle of Broadweave CEO Steve Christensen. In short, it appears that Broadweave's sole development project is the result of an inside family deal, not any kind of business acumen. This should raise a lot more questions about the viability of this provider.

It's also reported that the supposed development in Washington County that has a video head-end doesn't have an appropriate video franchise to operate it. Combined with the lack of video in Traverse Ridge, we should be asking if Provo is best served by an exclusive provider with zero video experience. Survey says "not bloody likely".

The stink on this one grows every day.

UPDATE: According to this article copied from the Deseret News, they are actually father and son. Still shady; title has been fixed.

Editorial: Broadweave purchase revives memory of past failings

By | | ,
Leave a comment

This opinion piece was published in today's Daily Herald.

As an advocate for open-access municipal fiber optic networks, I was disappointed to learn that Provo planned to sell iProvo, the nation's largest such network, to a private entity who planned to become the sole retailer. This disappointment quickly turned to disgust and outrage as more details of this secretly-brokered deal surfaced. After attending several of the public meetings and doing some research, I am convinced that the city of Provo is about to embark on the "SS HomeNet" for a second time.

Continue reading →

The BlogHive Reacts to Proposed iProvo Sale

By | |
29 Comments

There's been a lot of good commentary from other bloggers about the pending sale of iProvo to Broadweave Networks and it appears to be mixed at best.

I've yet to see any bloggers writing unabashedly in praise of this proposed sale. Could it be that we all know that this deal has serious issues?

Leaks: Broadweave Will Buy Out Customer Lists From Existing iProvo Providers

By | | , ,
4 Comments

This morning, an inside source disclosed the fate of the existing iProvo retailers. According to this source, Broadweave plans to announce on Thursday that they will be buying out the customer lists from MSTAR, Veracity and Nuvont to become the sole retailer on the network. This move comes as MSTAR has been found to be about $950K in arrears to Provo for their use of the network, only $75K of which is expected to be paid prior to the transition. As part of the acquisition, Broadweave will assume the remainder as a debt due to it from MSTAR.

Between this debt load and their recent layoffs, there is serious concern that MSTAR could fold in the very near future leaving UTOPIA without a triple-play provider. This comes as Todd Marriott announced at the Payson City Council meeting that some new triple-play providers are on-deck to join the network and increase competitive choice, no doubt a result of his experience in the telecommunications field. Since the sale of iProvo to Broadweave looks likely to close and the deadline for sale in June 30, there's little time left to pick up the pieces if MSTAR's financial condition rapidly deteriorates.

Todd Marriott Named New UTOPIA Executive Director

By | | , ,
Leave a comment

As unveiled at the meeting in Payson, Todd Marriott was named as the new Executive Director of UTOPIA today. I had suspected it from the moment they introduced him at one of the earlier meetings and it's exciting to have someone with sales savvy and a passion for open networks take the helm to lead UTOPIA in a sorely-needed new direction. I can't find much about him online other than a stint with CityLink Networks in Fruit Heights, but he seems to really know his stuff. Here's to hoping things get back on track.

Payson Says No Again By 4-1 Vote

By | | , ,
3 Comments

Despite high hopes. Payson's City Council voted 4-1 against the new UTOPIA bonds citing concerns about their future revenue streams. Council Member Hancock cast the lone yes vote despite getting a second for the motion to adopt the resolution. This means that they will likely have to start paying out around $259K every year over the next 19 years to satisfy their portion of the old bonds.

I view this move as a calculated risk. Payson knew they were getting their network regardless of how they voted because it makes financial sense for UTOPIA. They also know that their pledge amount is small enough that it won't sink the deal. In short, they knew that opting to not pledge additional money would not mean they wouldn't see more of the network and decided to enjoy the benefit of UTOPIA without risking any more money. I think they also have a hope in their mind that UTOPIA may not call their bond pledge immediately or may opt not to do so at all if it can retire the old bond with the proceeds of the new bond. I hope that isn't their game because it's very unfair to other member cities. 

The iProvo Deal Worsens: Broadweave Also Plans to Buy Defunct OEN Network in Houston

By | | , ,
10 Comments

Talk about stretching yourself thin. Broadweave mentioned to the Daily Herald that they plan to buy a fiber optic network in Houston, Texas, likely the OEN network that went belly-up after less than a year of operations. They only manged to reach about 5,000 customers before abruptly halting service, falling far short of their goal to wire 1.6M homes. Despite the large investments from venture capitalists, I doubt Broadweave has the money to continue construction in Houston, do further roll-outs in Provo and continue to build their network in Traverse Mountain.

Wake up, Provo. This company isn't going to be around more than a couple of years and you'll still be left holding the bag.

EDIT: Almost forgot to mention that Broadweave also plans to upgrade the TV signals on iProvo from MPEG-2 to MPEG-4. This will require replacing the existing set-top boxes to support the new signals. At around $300 a pop, it would take nearly $1.8M to upgrade the existing video customers on iProvo. Yet another hunk of cash I doubt they have.